PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS     CURRENT STUDENTS     ALUMNI & FRIENDS     COMMUNITY     FACULTY & STAFF
 

Main

April 18, 2008

Right name (of the university), wrong name (of the professor)

J. David Rogers, the Karl F. Hasselmann Chair of geological engineering at Missouri S&T, has been busy fielding all sorts of media calls in the wake of today's earthquake in Illinois. (Follow updates on the Missouri S&T Twitter site.) From a PR/media relations perspective, it's a great way to get the new university name out. But sometimes, even the simplest names can get botched in the pursuit of a breaking story.

Rogers_TV.jpg

That should be Rogers (with no "d").

March 17, 2008

A great weekend to get the new name out

The name Missouri University of Science and Technology is starting to get out, thanks to some great media coverage of the 100th anniversary of St. Pat's and the accomplishments of a couple of our sports programs. Here's a quick rundown:

Unfortunately, the great sports news hasn't generated as much buzz as we would like -- or as the sports programs deserve. We're still better known for St. Pat's than for athletics. But we're making sure that those who care the most about this university know about the great things that are happening. People are starting to hear about the Missouri S&T name, and for good reason.

August 27, 2007

Name confusion: 'Wired' covers UMR student project, 'University of Missouri' gets the recognition

When we developed our case for a name change last fall, I thought one of the most compelling arguments -- at least from a PR and marketing standpoint -- had to do with how the national news media so often confuse us with the University of Missouri-Columbia, or just "University of Missouri," which in the minds of many, means the campus in Columbia.

"The UMR name," we wrote back then, "is well known in our geographic region and among the research agencies and corporate recruiters aware of our areas of expertise. However, beyond those areas, the name and reputation are either confused with MU or unknown by uninformed students, corporate partners and opinion leaders." We also pointed out that "Alumni, faculty and staff report the campus confusion, as they are often referred to as being associated with the 'University of Missouri' in edited biographies, introductions and news media reports."

It's that association that really sticks in my craw as a PR guy.

Case in point: The latest edition of Wired magazine carries a nice article about last spring's Regolith Excavation Challenge, a program put on by NASA that is "aimed at applying outsider ingenuity to space colonization." One of the teams was from this campus. (We blogged all about it before, during and after the competition, and got some pretty nice media coverage about our Lunar Miners team and their excavation craft. We even got a mention on the Wired Science blog.)

But in the September 2007 edition of Wired, our team is known merely as "11 University of Missouri students." Here's the context, from the story's opening paragraphs:

Four couch-sized contraptions, all clearly homebuilt, sit inside a cavernous building at the Santa Maria, California, fairgrounds. One, made of unfinished wood, has denim conveyor belts running over purple and orange plastic beads. It's the brainchild of a boiler engineer from Michigan, whose girlfriend sewed the belts. Another, cobbled together by a systems analyst from nearby Arroyo Grande, features a set of steel trays attached to a long bicycle chain. A team of Los Angeles engineers used precisely machined aluminum and incorporated a toothed rotor that spins like a waterwheel. The tallest of the bunch, standing about 5 feet high, is a clattering assemblage of aluminum scoops mounted on a red conveyor. It represents a year and a half of work by 11 University of Missouri students, two of whom drove 30 hours to get the thing here. They're still scrambling to apply the finishing touches, slapping masking tape on the cups and adjusting bungee cords to keep it upright.

That really sticks in my craw. But perhaps it will drive home at least one of the points we made in the rationale for the name change.

March 23, 2007

'Missouri S&T' proposed as new name

Chancellor John F. Carney III today announced that he is asking the University of Missouri Board of Curators to approve changing the institution’s name to Missouri University of Science and Technology – or Missouri S&T for short.


The board will consider the name-change proposal at its April 5-6 meeting on the Rolla campus.

The request follows more than six months of research and discussion with numerous UMR constituents, including alumni, students, prospective students, faculty, staff, corporate recruiters and community leaders. The new name, if approved by the board, would be effective Jan. 1, 2008.

Carney says the name change will help the institution have a stronger identity while remaining a part of the four-campus University of Missouri.

“Missouri S&T will better define the university as a leading technological research university,” Carney says. “We believe the new name will help to differentiate this university in a highly competitive university market and provide a national competitive advantage.”

Full news release online at news.mst.edu/2007/namechange.html.

The full text of Chancellor Carney's remarks follow.

Continue reading "'Missouri S&T' proposed as new name" »

March 22, 2007

Media advisory: UMR chancellor to announce proposed name change

Update: Since this media advisory and an announcement to alumni went out, several comments this blog has received from alumni address information about the announcement. Since this is a public blog, those comments that reference topics to be addressed at the news conference will be posted after the news conference begins (after 11 a.m. CDT Friday, March 23). That is when this information will become publicly available.

The following media advisory was released by UMR Public Relations at 4 p.m. CDT Thursday, March 22, 2007:

Media advisory:
UMR chancellor to announce proposed name change

When: 11 a.m. Friday, March 23
Where: St. Pat’s Ballroom A, Havener Center
University of Missouri-Rolla campus

ROLLA, Mo. -- University of Missouri-Rolla Chancellor John F. Carney III will make an announcement related to a proposed change in the institution’s name during a news conference to be held at 11 a.m. Friday, March 23, in St. Pat’s Ballroom A in the Havener Center on the UMR campus.

Media interested in attending should contact the UMR office of public relations at 573-341-4328.

February 10, 2007

Almost famous?

Andy Warhol once quipped: "Everyone will be famous for 15 minutes." The virtual world corollary to that is:"In the blogosphere, everyone will be famous to 15 people." I'm not sure which applies in this case, but I'm pleased to report that this blog has been recognized by one of the better blogs in higher education: Karine Joly's college web editor website.

In Joly's post -- Got a (controversial) change in the plans at your institution? A blog might be the perfect communication channel. -- she writes:

In higher education, the announcement of any proposed change (be it a website or logo redesign, a new strategic plan or even worse a change in the name of the institution) will result in complaints, fights, protests and worst case scenario: status quo.

That’s why the communication around the decision-making process is so critical. It’s very important to offer the proper communication channels to allow people to voice their concerns or their praises.

She then refers to this blog and explains why openness is important to this type of communication: "Obviously, comments -- mainly from alums at the time of this writing -- are open as the reverse would defeat the whole purpose of the blog, i.e. get conversations going about the project."

Joly seems to see value in this type of blog. Regardless of whether you agree with the approach UMR is taking with this name change discussion, I hope you see some value to this blogging effort, too. (And I hope there's more than 15 of you out there reading.)

February 01, 2007

The name change in the news

Lots of good discussion going so far. Thanks for entering the fray. To keep the conversation going, I'd welcome your input on some of the recent coverage the name change topic has received from the opinion pages of Missouri newspapers: